Let me start by saying this:
I’m a rescue girl, through and through.
I feel like there are so many dogs in the world that need loving, supportive homes, I will always support adoption.
Breeding is a whole other world that I’m only just now starting to learn about, and quite frankly, it doesn’t really interest me much, other than how genetics play a part in behaviours.
(Although we will talk about breeders another day.)
My heart belongs with dogs who need to find homes.
Bred dogs generally all find homes. An ethical breeder… they’ll have a waiting list of guardians ready for their dogs to be homed to.
Rescue dogs don’t have that, and they become rescue dogs for a number of reasons.
- Sometimes circumstances change
- Sometimes their guardians pass away
- Sometimes they move and they truly can’t take the dog
- Sometimes the humans start having children and they realize their dog is not a great fit for a family with babies, toddlers, or children.
There are many reasons to rehome a dog, and there are not many that I judge people for.
My issue is in the rescues who are bringing dogs in from other areas.
The rescues who are bringing shipments, literally shipments of dogs in from kill shelters in Texas, or street dogs from Cuba or Mexico, or potcakes from places like from St Lucia, or meat dogs from Korea….
I understand the people wanting to help all of those kinds of dogs.
I understand wanting to choose a dog who needs a home.
I understand seeing the sad faces, and hearing the sad stories, and knowing that you have all the love to give them.
I understand it because am that person. (That’s how I got Kitchi!)
But unfortunately, not all rescues are created equal.
And it’s about time we talk about it.
This is going to be uncomfortable, and there may be people who don’t like what I’m about to say, but for the love of dogs, I have to say it…
All of these dogs that the rescues are bringing in via shipments… they are a problem.
Very rarely are these dogs being assessed properly.
Not for temperament, not for behavior, not for health.
None of it.
And a big part of that problem is that many of these dogs have never lived as pets.
Some have never worn a collar.
Some have never walked on a leash.
Some have never even lived inside a home.
Some have spent their lives surviving on the streets, making their own decisions, finding their own food, and navigating the world on their own terms.
Then suddenly they’re captured, transported hundreds or thousands of kilometers, and placed directly into family homes.
No assessments on what a great fit for the dog will be,
what their temperament is like,
or their behaivoural issues might be.
There is also no support for the guardians who think they’re getting a typical pet dog… but they aren’t.
They don’t know how to work with a dog who has never lived with a human before, or outside of a shelter.
They are often given information that is incomplete, inaccurate, or entirely missing.
I hesitate to use the word “lie”… but the truth is that many of the guardians who take on these dogs because they truly want to help them, find themselves in situations they are not mentally, emotionally, physically, or financially prepared for. And it’s not their fault.
Dogs that are terrified of being handles.
Dogs who have never been house-trained.
Dogs with medical conditions that we unknown or not disclosed.
Dogs with significant reactivity behaviour and behavioural concerns.
Frankly dogs whose histories are largely unknown.
And yes, their histories matter.
These challenges do not make the dog “a bad dog”, nor to they make their new guardians “bad owners”.
The onus is on the rescue, here, in my educated opinion.
Because transporting a dog and collecting money for it is not the same as rescuing.
So how do we know if we are truly rescuing a dog?
I’m so glad you asked!
A rescue who is truly in it to help dogs will be prepared to support both the dogs and the humans they’ll be living with.
That means:
- Detailed, honest assessments on behaviour and temperament
- Behavioural support from qualified, ethical, science-based canine professionals
- Veterinary support for fosters (and for the guardians until they have their own)
- Full transparency and knowing it’s ok to say:
- Not tested/not ok with cats
- Unknown history
- Not tested/not ok with children
- Reactive to *fill in the blank* (other dogs/men/women/people in uniform/etc)
Adopting a dog is a really wonderful thing to do,
and figuring out who to adopt a dog from shouldn’t be so hard…
There is often an extensive application process when adopting a dog complete with an interview, reference check, and home visit.
(If there isn’t, that’s you’re first red flag)
And, I think, we should also expect the same transparency from the rescues we want to adopt from!
So let’s go through some questions to ask, and what some red flag(and green flag
) answers may be because the more information that we have about what to look for, and what to stay away from, when it comes to rescues, the better the chances of finding a reputable rescue that is really truly in it for the dog. And the more we support those rescues, the more dogs we actually, truly, get to help.
Social Media Flags
- Every dog is called “perfect,” “amazing,” or “ready for anything”
- No mention that dogs might need time to settle into a new home
- No honest talk about behaviour struggles or things that are still a work in progress
- Dogs are shown more like a product listing than a real individual
- Behaviour gets described with human blame words like “stubborn,” “spiteful,” or “angry”
- Fear, stress, or overwhelm gets brushed off like it doesn’t really matter
- Quick-fix language like “just needs a firm hand” gets used
- Urgency language: “last chance,” “save them now,” “they’ll die if not adopted”, etc
- Posts feel more like marketing than real life
- There’s pressure to decide fast instead of taking time to think
- No real conversation about what kind of home would actually fit the dog
- Risks or possible mismatches are not really talked about
- Questions about behaviour or history get ignored or deleted and/or poster gets defensive or snappy when someone asks normal, fair questions
- Only the happy, polished outcomes get shown… never the hard parts
- Guilt messaging like “no one else will save them but you”
- They show real-life behaviour, not just staged cute photos
- They talk about small progress, not just big transformations
- They don’t rush to label or adopt out a dog too early (they say “still learning about them”)
- They show how they help dogs feel safe, not just how “adoptable” they are
- They talk about decompression time after intake or rescue changes
- They explain why a dog might NOT be a good fit for some homes
- They normalize things like fear, shutdown, excitement, or overwhelm
- They share educational posts, not just adoption ads
- They show teamwork (fosters, vets, trainers all involved)
- They update posts when they learn new things about a dog and will say “we were wrong / we learned more about this dog”
- They don’t rush “success stories” or adoption pics before a dog is actually settled
- They focus on long-term outcomes, not quick placements
- They show realistic home life expectations
- They highlight compatibility (who the dog is a good match for, not just “adopt me”)
Philosophy, Ethics & Transparency
Philosophy, Ethics & Transparency
Questions
- Why was this rescue created? What’s it’s origin story?
- What is your return policy if the adoption is truly not safe or successful? Is there a timeline?
- Are animals legally required by contract to be returned to your rescue specifically?
- How do you handle emergency rehoming situations if an adopter faces a sudden crisis?
- What is your rescue’s core philosophy on animal welfare and care?
- What is more important, speed of adoption or finding the right fit?
- Where do most of your animals come from (owner surrenders, municipal shelters, out-of-province/country transport, strays)?
- How do you decide which animals to take in and which you cannot?
- What happens when an animal requires long-term or intensive medical or behavioural support?
- How long, on average, do animals stay in your care before adoption?
- What’s the hardest truth about rescue work that adopters rarely see?
- What types of adopters or environments are not a good fit for your rescue?”
- “We save them all” with no explanation of capacity limits
- They cannot answer the first five questions
- Blame-heavy language about previous owners or other rescues
- Refuses to acknowledge any organizational challenges
- Clear, consistent philosophy (welfare-first, match-focused, not volume-focused)
- Honest about limitations (“we wish we had more foster homes”)
- Talks about individual animals as complex, not “easy/hard”
- Can explain decision-making without blame or drama
Medical Care, Intake Standards & Veterinary Protocols
Medical Care, Intake Standards
& Veterinary Protocols
- What is your standard medical protocol when an animal enters your care?
- Do all animals receive a veterinary exam upon intake?
- Are vaccines, parasite prevention, and microchipping included as standard?
- What is your policy on spays and neuters, and why?
- Will adopters receive full veterinary records (including those from your care)?
- How do you handle medical issues discovered during the adoption process?
- How do you manage hidden or developing medical conditions that appear after intake?
- What happens if you have not disclosed any medical issues to the foster and/or adopter?
- “They’re healthy” with no documentation or vet records offered
- Avoids giving written medical history
- Vague answers like “we think they’re up to date”
- Downplays or hides ongoing medical issues
- Clear intake protocol (vet exam, vaccines, parasite control, records)
- Will provide full medical records without hesitation
- Acknowledges uncertainty in medical history when relevant
- Talks about ongoing monitoring honestly (“we’re still observing X symptoms”)
Behaviour Assessment
Behaviour Assessment & Foster Network
- How do you assess temperament and suitability for adoption?
- Are animals placed in foster homes, a facility, or a mix of both? Or are they place/picked up by the adopters directly?
- Do you conduct structured, observed meet-and-greets with adopters, household members, and existing pets?
- How do you determine what kind of home is a good match for each animal?
- Are dogs matched based on a checklist (like “must have fenced yard, no kids, no exceptions”), or do you look at at the whole picture of the adopters life with the dog’s needs in mind?
- Overly simplistic labels (“perfect dog”, “no issues”, “just needs love”)
- Dismisses concerning behaviours (“oh that’s normal” without detail)
- Cannot explain when or why behaviours happen
- Avoids discussing aggression, fear, or reactivity entirely
- Describes behaviour in context (“they bark when…” not “they’re reactive”)
- Can explain triggers, patterns, and what helps the animal regulate
- Will openly discuss challenges (including bites or serious incidents if applicable)
- Uses observational language rather than labels
Foster System & Communication
Foster System & Communication
- How are foster caregivers selected, trained, and supported (financially, medically, behaviourally)?
- How long do animals typically stay in foster care before adoption?
- What kinds of daily situations do fosters actually observe (alone time, visitors, walks, other animals, etc.)?
- Do you use structured behaviour tracking or informal foster notes?
- How do you handle changes in an animal’s behaviour over time in foster care?
- Will I be able to speak directly with the foster caregiver before adoption?
- How detailed are foster reports shared with adopters?
- Can adopters ask follow-up questions after reading a foster description?
- How quickly do fosters or staff typically respond to adopter questions?
- What support do fosters receive if they are unsure about behaviour, handling, or medical concerns?
- Who do fosters report to if they have concerns about an animal?
- Is there a behaviour professional or coordinator overseeing foster feedback and communication?
- “We don’t really know, they’re just in foster”
- No access to foster caregivers or inconsistent stories
- Behavioural info changes depending on who you ask
- Over-reliance on intake notes with little lived observation
- Fosters are actively involved and can give detailed behavioural insight
- You’re encouraged to ask questions and interact with caregivers
- Information is consistent across staff/foster reports
- Clear structure for how observations are recorded
Adoption Process & Matching System
Adoption Process & Matching System
- What does your full adoption process look like from application, to meet and greets, reference calls, through to placement?
- How are adopters screened and approved?
- What would cause an application to be declined?
- Do you operate on a first-come-first-served basis or a best-match system?
- How long does the adoption process typically take?
- Do you allow adopters to visit or interact with animals before committing?
- What happens if an adopter changes their mind at any time during the adoption process?
- Do you offer a trial adoption period?
- First-come-first-served as the primary system
- Pushes adoption quickly without discussion of fit
- No clear reasoning behind approvals/denials
- “If you want them, you can take them today” energy with no assessment
- Prioritizes fit over speed (“we want the right home, not the first home”)
- Explains why certain homes are or aren’t appropriate
- Uses structured screening but still considers nuance
- Will say “this might not be the right match for you” when appropriate
Post Adoption Support & Safety Nets
Post-Adoption Support & Safety Nets
- What kind of support do you provide after adoption?
- Do you offer guidance during the transition period?
- Do you have access to trainers, behaviour professionals, or veterinary partners you recommend?
- What is your policy if an adoption does not work out?
- Are animals required to be returned to your rescue regardless of time passed?
- Do you offer a trial period or foster-to-adopt option before finalizing adoption?
- If medical or behavioural concerns arise shortly after adoption, what is your support process?
- “Once adopted, it’s your responsibility” with no support structure
- No return policy or makes returns feel shameful or discouraged
- No post-adoption contact or follow-up system
- Avoids discussing what happens when things go wrong
- Clear support pathways (who to contact, what happens next)
- Willing to help troubleshoot after adoption
- Has return policy clearly centred on animal safety, not judgment
- Offers resources or referrals (trainers, vets, behaviour support)
Operations, Sourcing & Ethical Responsibility
Operations, Sourcing & Ethical Responsibility
- Do you transport animals from other regions or countries? If so, how is that managed and regulated?
- What is your euthanasia policy, if any, and under what circumstances is it used?
- How do you ensure welfare standards are maintained during transport or transfer?
- What are your biggest operational challenges right now (funding, fosters, capacity, etc.)?
- How do you ensure animals are not being moved through the system too quickly without adequate assessment?
- No clarity on where animals come from
- Defensive or evasive about transport/import practices
- “We never have to euthanize” (often unrealistic in real systems)
- Over-idealized rescue narrative with no operational realism
- Open about transport, sourcing, and capacity limits
- Acknowledges euthanasia policies transparently (if applicable)
- Can explain why they take animals from certain regions or systems
- Talks about systemic challenges without drama or secrecy
Communication, Honestly & Accountability
Communication, Honesty & Accountability
- How often do you share behavioural or medical concerns before adoption?
- Can adopters speak directly with fosters or caregivers?
- How do you communicate updates or changes about an animal’s status?
- What does “success” mean to your rescue?
- What do you think most people misunderstand about rescue work?
- Overconfidence in incomplete information
- Pressure tactics (“many people are interested, decide now”)
- Avoidance of difficult questions
- Contradictions between staff, website, and fosters
- Comfortable saying “we don’t know yet”
- Admits uncertainty or gaps in history
- Willing to discuss worst-case scenarios honestly
- Doesn’t rush or pressure you into decisions
Don’t be afraid to ask questions before choosing to work with a rescue, whether you are asking as a volunteer, a foster, or a potentional adopter.
The more information that we have about what to look for and what to stay away from when it comes to rescues, the better the chances of finding a reputable rescue that is really truly in it for the dog. And the more we choose reputable rescues, the more reputable rescues there will be.
Bonus!
My colleague and fellow Good Dog Academy – Professional Dog Trainer and Family Dog Mediator, Jennyfer Tan, has graciously shared the following resources for everyone to benefit from. Not only does Jennyfer have experience in working with rescues, but she also has a rescue dog herself, as well as a neurodivergent son, and has a great wealth of knowledge that she is happily sharing in hopes that more people can benefit from her knowledge, education, and experiences.
I also highly recommend checking out her podcast as well, “Under the Same Roof” (Spotify link below)
"Before You Bring a Dog Home" is an honest guide for families considering adoption, especially families with an autistic or neurodivergent member and is an excellent resource:
